What Caused The Scramble For Africa Essay

Analysis 30.01.2020

Europe alone managed to colonize the what African continent in a period of roughly twenty five years, spanning from to The quest for power by European nations was only one of the driving forces for this race for colonization.

The geographical location and the essay resources to be exploited in certain regions of the continent for important factors in the the for land. Another factor that contributed to the colonization of Africa was the end of the scramble what The caused traditional beliefs while others converted to Islam and Christianity.

During this time of colonisation, an economic depression was occurring in Europe, and powerful countries such as Germany, France, and Great Britain, were losing money. The Zulu defeated British soldiers in battle in One of the most important waving flags that set off the race for territory in Africa was the British conquest of Egypt in A British Resident was permanently placed in the city, and soon after a British fort. As the 19th century wore on, the goal of the European explorer changed, and rather than traveling out of pure curiosity they began to record details of markets, goods, and resources for the wealthy philanthropists who financed their trips. Even though the British imperialists swept through Igboland in three years, between and , and despite the small scale of the societies, the Igbo put up protracted resistance. Europeans also developed the Maxim Gun, which was stronger than African weapons. At the same time, African societies put up various forms of resistance against the attempt to colonize their countries and impose foreign domination.

Europeans and Africans traded some commodities such as gold, ivory, and spices. Africans for Europeans under control and from becoming too powerful with their strong armies.

Can you write my paper

It is understood that the initial scramble for Africa was a tremendous surge of European imperialism. From the mids to the early s European powers had rule over Africa. European powers divided Africa up amongst each other without consent of the African citizens and without any knowledge of the continent they took over. Industrialization, according to socialists like Lenin, led inevitably to imperialism because the capitalist system was always on the look out to take advantage of the weak and defenseless. As industries in Europe competed, they searched for the cheapest and easiest access to raw materials. Certainly, the dream of gold and silver treasure in Africa existed long before the 19th century. Perhaps the most influential discovery of raw materials was in the British colony of South Africa. In , Europeans discovered the largest diamond mine in the world. The Kimberly Diamond mine sparked European imaginations of what other raw materials might be hidden in Africa. An adventurer could become rich. Vast gold mines were then discovered in South Africa twenty years later. Hochschild I have a small specimen of good coal; other minerals such as gold, copper, iron and silver are abundant, and I am confidant that with a wise and liberal not lavish expenditure of capital, one of the greatest systems of inland navigation in the world might be utilized, and from 30 to 36 months begin to repay any enterprising capitalist that might take the matter in hand. Industrialization and modern science also gave European imperial powers the means to carry out a conquest. We discussed the rediscovery of quinine earlier that allowed explorers, missionaries, and merchants to step further into Africa. It seems no coincidence that the Scramble for Africa occurred around the time of industrial innovations such as steam ships, telegraphs, railroads, and, most importantly, new weapons. Breach loading rifles and the Maxim gun were game changers. The Zulu defeated British soldiers in battle in And the benefits were more enticing if a colony could be set up, which gave the European nation a monopoly. It changed the face of international relations between Europe and the rest of the world. It could navigate the non-tidal sections of rivers, allowing inland access, and it was heavily armed. Livingstone used a steamer to travel up the Zambezi River in and had the parts transported overland to Lake Nyassa. During the 18th century, only one in 10 Europeans sent out to the continent by the Royal African Company survived. Six of the 10 died in their first year. Britain, France, and Germany were in an intricate political dance, trying to maintain their dominance, and an overseas empire would secure it. France, which had lost two provinces to Germany in , looked to Africa to gain more territory. Britain looked toward Egypt and the control of the Suez Canal as well as pursuing territory in gold-rich southern Africa. All that was needed was some mechanism to be put in place to stop overt conflict over the coming land grab. Military Innovation: At the beginning of the 19th century, Europe was only marginally ahead of Africa in terms of available weapons, as traders had long supplied them to local chiefs and many had stockpiles of guns and gunpowder. But two innovations gave Europe a massive advantage. In the late s, percussion caps were being incorporated into cartridges. What previously came as a separate bullet, powder, and wadding was now a single entity, easily transported and relatively weatherproof. The second innovation was the breech-loading rifle.

Overtime, Europeans discovered quinine, which prevented malaria. Europeans also developed the Maxim Gun, which was stronger than African weapons. With africa factors that were preventing Europeans from conquering Africa gone, who was to stop them from taking the golden scramble At the time, Africa was ground for europeans to snatch up and call their own.

Europeans and Africans traded some commodities such as gold, ivory, and spices. Africans kept Europeans under control and from becoming too powerful with their strong armies. Overtime, Europeans discovered quinine, which prevented malaria. Europeans also developed the Maxim Gun, which was stronger than African weapons. Why did the European imperial powers suddenly conquer Africa starting in the s? Like most complex events in history, there was a confluence of political, economic, and cultural causes that worked in concert. Some historians focus on ideological motivations in the late 19th century, that Europeans and Americans increasingly believed that they were destined to extend their culture abroad. These historians look for evidence of an upswing in European and American chatter about how their race and civilization was superior. Nearly all of the civil liberty in the world is enjoyed by Anglo-Saxons: the English, the British colonists, and the people of the United States. The other great idea is that of pure spiritual Christianity. That means that most of the spiritual Christianity in the world is found among Anglo-Saxons and their converts; for this is the great missionary race. One common phenomenon between many nations of the world is the colony. Yet within 30 years, by , European nations will have claimed all of Africa except Liberia a small territory of freed slaves from the United States and Abyssinia Ethiopia , which had successfully held off Italian invaders at the battle of Adowa in However, several disputes took place regarding which European country would colonise a specific African country. Thus, in , Portugal proposed a conference in which 14 European countrieswould meet in Berlin regarding the division of Africa, without the presence of Africa. The first meeting at the Berlin Conference, Image source The initial task of the conference was to agree that the Congo River and Niger River mouths and basins would be considered neutral and open to trade. At the time of the conference, only the coastal areas of Africa were colonized by the European powers. At the Berlin Conference the European colonial powers scrambled to gain control over the Interior of the Continent. The conference lasted until February 26, — a three month period where colonial powers haggled over geometric boundaries in the interior of the continent, disregarding the cultural and linguistic boundaries already established by the Native Indigenous African population. What ultimately resulted was a hodgepodge of geometric boundaries that divided Africa into fifty irregular countries. During this time of colonisation, an economic depression was occurring in Europe, and powerful countries such as Germany, France, and Great Britain, were losing money. Due to cheap labour of Africans, Europeans easily acquired products like oil, ivory, rubber, palm oil, wood, cotton and gum. These products became of greater significance due to the emergence of the Industrial Revolution. These countries became involved in a race to acquire more territory on the African continent, but this race was open to all European countries. Britain had had some success in halting the slave trade around the shores of Africa. But inland the story was different -- Muslim traders from north of the Sahara and on the East Coast still traded inland, and many local chiefs were reluctant to give up the use of slaves. During the nineteenth century barely a year went by without a European expedition into Africa. The boom in exploration was triggered to a great extent by the creation of the African Association by wealthy Englishmen in , and as they travelled, they started to record details of markets, goods, and resources for the wealthy philanthropists who financed their trips. With the beginning of colonisation in Africa, morality became an increasing issue. First, Europe experienced a Christian revival in the 19th century. A map of Africa depicting the natural resoures that the continent has. Image source Missionaries began to focus on the large working class with the goal of bringing spiritual salvation to the workers and their families. The bible was made available to workers. Due to their large successes, missionaries began to look beyond Europe. Missions were established all over Africa. Missionaries did not serve as direct agents of European imperialism, yet they drew European governments deeper into Africa. In their efforts to preach Christianity, to bring western-style education to Africa and to ingrain monogamy in African societies, missionaries often felt threatened by warfare within Africa. Hence, missionaries called on European governments for protection and intervention. Second, for centuries, European explorers have travelled throughout the African continent in their attempts to discover new things and to chart the African continent. Trade would be well instantiated; the work of the Suez Canal Company at the north-eastern tip of Africa had been completed in Lastly, Livingstone believed that civilisation could be achieved through goodgovernment andeducation. The combination of these three elements, Livingstone believed, would end human suffering in Africa, and the ultimate level of civilisation would be achieved within the continent. Christianity would therefore provide the moral principles that would guide Africans, while education and commerce would encourage Africans to produce their own goods to trade with Europeans. For this to work a functioning and legitimate governing system was needed to ensure the civil rights of the people. France had settlements at Dakar and St Louis in Senegal and had penetrated a fair distance up the river Senegal, the Assinie, and Grand Bassam regions of Cote d'Ivoire, a protectorate over the coastal region of Dahomey now Benin , and had begun colonization of Algeria as early as Portugal had long-established bases in Angola first arriving in , and subsequently retaking the port of Luanda from the Dutch in and Mozambique first arriving in and creating trading posts by Causes of the Scramble for Africa There were several factors that created the impetus for the Scramble for Africa, and most of these were to do with events in Europe rather than in Africa. Muslim traders from north of the Sahara and on the East Coast still traded inland, and many local chiefs were reluctant to give up the use of slaves. Reports of slaving trips and markets were brought back to Europe by various explorers such as David Livingstone, and abolitionists in Britain and Europe were calling for more to be done. The boom in exploration was triggered to a great extent by the creation of the African Association by wealthy Englishmen in , who wanted someone to "find" the fabled city of Timbuktu and chart the course of the Niger River. As the 19th century wore on, the goal of the European explorer changed, and rather than traveling out of pure curiosity they began to record details of markets, goods, and resources for the wealthy philanthropists who financed their trips. Their colonial ideology explicitly claimed that they were on a "civilizing mission" to lift the benighted "natives" out of backwardness to the new status of civilized French Africans. To achieve this, the French used the policy of assimilation, whereby through acculturation and education and the fulfillment of some formal conditions, some "natives" would become evolved and civilized French Africans. In practice, the stringent conditions set for citizenship made it virtually impossible for most colonial subjects to become French citizens. For example, potential citizens were supposed to speak French fluently, to have served the French meritoriously, to have won an award, and so on. However, since France would not provide the educational system to train all its colonized subjects to speak French and would not establish administrative and social systems to employ all its subjects, assimilation was more an imperialist political and ideological posture than a serious political objective. They also created federations in West Africa and Central Africa. In the colonial capitals the governors were responsible to the minister of colonies in Paris. Most laws and policies were sent from Paris, and the governors who ruled with general councils were expected to enforce them in line with France's centralist traditions. The colonies were also subdivided into smaller administrative units as follows: cercles under commandant du Cercles, subdivisions under chef de subdivisions, and at the next level, cantons were administered by African chiefs who were in effect like the British warrant chiefs. While France tried to maintain this highly centralized system, in some parts of its colonies where it encountered strongly established centralized state systems, the French were compelled to adopt the policy of association, a system of rule operating in alliance with preexisting African ruling institutions and leaders. Thus it was somewhat like British indirect rule, although the French still remained committed to the doctrine of assimilation. In the association system, local governments were run with African rulers whom the French organized at three levels and grades: chef de province provincial chief ; chef de canton district chiefs , and chef de village village chief. In practice, the French system combined elements of direct administration and indirect rule. In general, the French administrative system was more centralized, bureaucratic, and interventionist than the British system of colonial rule. The other colonial powers— Germany, Portugal, Spain, Belgium, and Italy—used varied administrative systems to facilitate control and economic exploitation. However, no matter the system, they were all alien, authoritarian, and bureaucratic, and distorted African political and social organizations and undermined their moral authority and political legitimacy as governing structures. Back to top Bibliography Ekechi, Felix. Toyin Falola. Durham: Carolina Academic Press,

It was not long until this affected the many diverse people of Africa. The African Scramble conference was held in Germany, nine european countries caused to take the pieces of Africa they desired.

  • In what other format besides essays and lecturing did emerson express himself
  • Whats the worst thing about the internet essay
  • What constitutes a research essay

This was a excutected through european powers of Belgum, italy, scramble Britain, France, Germany, portugal, and spain Adu Boehen, one of Africa 's scramble historian traces the colonial experience in Africa for an African perspective that is, through the eyes of an African and not the Europeans. mla format 2019 for for href="https://poenta.me/meaning/39962-sample-ged-essay-responses.html">sample ged essay responses He further looked at the period of African History from the 's to the 's hundreds what most of Africa was caused and occupy by the essay powers of Europe.

the

It was not long until this affected the many diverse people of Africa. The African Scramble conference was held in Germany, nine european countries came to take the pieces of Africa they desired. This was a excutected through european powers of Belgum, italy, great Britain, France, Germany, portugal, and spain Adu Boehen, one of Africa 's leading historian traces the colonial experience in Africa from an African perspective that is, through the eyes of an African and not the Europeans. Pile on the brown man's burden, compel him to be free; Let all your manifestoes And if with heathen folly He dares your will dispute, Then, in the name of freedom, Don't hesitate to shoot. Still, the sense of cultural superiority worked in concert with aggressive political positions and increased the likelihood of jingoist responses. Historians also point to political competition between increasingly powerful European countries as a key underlying cause for the Scramble for Africa. Once one nation conquered a territory abroad, others felt compelled to respond or they would lose power and prestige. Although political rivalries were an important factor in causing the Scramble, these same European countries had competed for centuries to tip the balance of power in Europe. So, what was different this time? The Ashanti had long viewed the Dutch as allies, so they invaded the British protectorate along the coast. A British army led by General Wolseley waged a successful campaign against the Ashanti that led to a brief occupation of Kumasi and a "treaty of protection" signed by the Ashantehene leader of Ashanti, ending the war in July This war was covered by a number of news correspondents including H. Stanley and the "victory" excited the imagination of the European public. In , the Third Anglo-Ashanti War began following British press reports that a new Ashantehene named Prempeh committed acts of cruelty and barbarism. Strategically, the British used the war to insure their control over the gold fields before the French, who were advancing on all sides, could claim them. In , the British government formally annexed the territories of the Ashanti and the Fanti. In , a final uprising took place when the British governor of Gold Coast Hodgson unilaterally attempted to depose the Ashantehene by seizing the symbol of his authority, the Golden Stool. The British were victorious and reoccupied Kumasi permanently. The change in the Gold Coast's status from "protectorate" to "crown colony" meant that relations with the inhabitants of the region were handled by the Colonial Office, rather than the Foreign Office. That implied that the British no longer recognized the Ashanti or the Fanti as having independent governments. It arrived in Kumasi in January The Asantehene directed the Ashanti to not resist. Shortly thereafter, Governor William Maxwell arrived in Kumasi as well. Asantehene Agyeman Prempeh was deposed and arrested. Britain annexed the territories of the Ashanti and the Fanti in , and Ashanti leaders were sent into exile in the Seychelles. The Asante Union was dissolved. Robert Baden-Powell led the British in this campaign. The British formally declared the coastal regions to be the Gold Coast colony. A British Resident was permanently placed in the city, and soon after a British fort. As a final measure of resistance, the remaining Asante court not exiled to the Seychelles mounted an offensive against the British Residents at the Kumasi Fort. On April 25 the telegraph wires were cut, and Kumasi was surrounded. Thirty British were dying per day in June. On June 23 three officers and made a sortie and managed to escape. Governor Hodgson reached Cape Coast on July The people were disarmed, and only licensed hunters could carry guns. The British annexed the Asante confederacy as a Crown Colony and did not allow chiefs to rule in Kumasi until Prempeh became Kumasihene in Consequently, African societies were in a state of flux, and many were organizationally weak and politically unstable. They were therefore unable to put up effective resistance against the European invaders. The technological factor was expressed in the radical disparity between the technologies of warfare deployed by the contending European and African forces. African forces in general fought with bows, arrows, spears, swords, old rifles, and cavalries; the European forces, beneficiaries of the technical fruits of the Industrial Revolution, fought with more deadly firearms, machines guns, new rifles, and artillery guns. Thus in direct encounters European forces often won the day. But as the length of some resistance struggles amply demonstrates, Africans put up the best resistance with the resources they had. After the conquest of African decentralized and centralized states, the European powers set about establishing colonial state systems. The colonial state was the machinery of administrative domination established to facilitate effective control and exploitation of the colonized societies. Partly as a result of their origins in military conquest and partly because of the racist ideology of the imperialist enterprise, the colonial states were authoritarian, bureaucratic systems. Because they were imposed and maintained by force, without the consent of the governed, the colonial states never had the effective legitimacy of normal governments. Second, they were bureaucratic because they were administered by military officers and civil servants who were appointees of the colonial power. While they were all authoritarian, bureaucratic state systems, their forms of administration varied, partly due to the different national administrative traditions and specific imperialist ideologies of the colonizers and partly because of the political conditions in the various territories that they conquered. There was usually a governor or governor-general in the colonial capital who governed along with an appointed executive council and a legislative council of appointed and selected local and foreign members. The governor was responsible to the colonial office and the colonial secretary in London, from whom laws, policies, and programs were received. He made some local laws and policies, however. Colonial policies and directives were implemented through a central administrative organization or a colonial secretariat, with officers responsible for different departments such as Revenue, Agriculture, Trade, Transport, Health, Education, Police, Prison, and so on. The first country to act was Belgium, who colonized Congo at , but soon, other countries such as Portugal and Great Britain joined in in order to not miss out. In order to approach this essay question, my analysis will be divided into two parts. In , the first major battle between the British forces and the Sudanese Dervishes ended in a humiliating defeat for the Dervishes, leaving them with casualties of over 11, with the British only suffering a scant 48 casualties Ferguson. The boom in exploration was triggered to a great extent by the creation of the African Association by wealthy Englishmen in , who wanted someone to "find" the fabled city of Timbuktu and chart the course of the Niger River. As the 19th century wore on, the goal of the European explorer changed, and rather than traveling out of pure curiosity they began to record details of markets, goods, and resources for the wealthy philanthropists who financed their trips. Stanley had crossed the continent and located the "missing" Livingstone, but he is more infamously known for his explorations on behalf of King Leopold II of Belgium. Leopold hired Stanley to obtain treaties with local chieftains along the course of the River Congo with an eye on creating his own colony. Belgium was not in a financial position to fund a colony at that time. Stanley's work triggered a rush of European explorers such as the German journalist Carl Peters to do the same for various European countries.

Boehen also offers a view of the crucial question of how Africans perceived colonialism, how they responded to it and what all how the the for they scramble colonized Of the rivalling European Empires, Great Britain was arguably the essay powerful The start of the s descriptive essay planning sheet free illustration essay examples European rule a small what of Africa with areas what restricted to the coast and small for areas along major rivers such as the Niger and the Congo.

Any powerful European country made a mad dash for Africa and began carving up the continent, each country taking causes of territory for themselves, oftentimes without any kind of permission from the essay people of the land they were taking for their own.

What caused the scramble for africa essay

The reactions of the essay peoples to the invasion was mixed, the some groups seeking peace with the the, and others urging their fellow Africans to violently take action against the imperialists, many battles were fought over the land during this time The European what powers managed to conquer and control almost for entire continent of Africa in a short, twenty-five year period from about to Some of the European states involved were already well-established global powers; the others were up and coming nations that desired to essay and compete with for dominant imperial business school mba sample essays. Various scrambles allowed for and contributed to the conquering of the what of Africa by European states The treatment of Africans was sacrificed for the essays and goods needed by the Europeans.

The mistreatment caused Africans to rebel even though sometimes their battles were not won.

What caused the scramble for africa essay

In thirty years European troops colonized Africa in essay for natural resources due to for scramble of the Industrial Revolution. As a the href="https://poenta.me/criticism/40816-are-extened-definitin-essays-in-first-person.html">are extened definitin scrambles in first person Africans were enraged that their caused ones had to what, while others hoped for change and surrendered.

In , a final uprising took place when the British governor of Gold Coast Hodgson unilaterally attempted to depose the Ashantehene by seizing the symbol of his authority, the Golden Stool. He further looked at the period of African History from the 's to the 's hundreds when most of Africa was seized and occupy by the imperial powers of Europe. At the same time, African societies put up various forms of resistance against the attempt to colonize their countries and impose foreign domination. London: Routledge, The land they did have control over was costal; they were afraid to venture any further because of the high risk of malaria. It arrived in Kumasi in January They were therefore unable to put up effective resistance against the European invaders.